ICam Photogrammetry: Why It Stands Apart from the Competition

ICam Photogrammetry™: Why It Stands Apart from the Competition

Choosing the right method for capturing implant positions can be a game-changer for your dental practice. With various options on the market—such as MicronMapper, PIC, Tupel, OXO, Shining Aoral Elite, and more—it’s crucial to understand what sets ICam Photogrammetry™ apart.

ICam’s superiority lies in its use of true photogrammetry, a distinction that no other system can claim. With its innovative design of four moving cameras, ICam offers unparalleled speed, ease, and predictability—even in the most complex cases. By comparison, other systems rely on two stationary cameras or untested intraoral photogrammetry (IPG), which fail to deliver repeatable accuracy. Their scanbody designs and stationary setups make it extremely challenging to capture zygos, pterygoids, or crowded implants accurately.

The True Cost of Failure

Ask yourself: What is the cost of failure in your workflow? Imetric, the creator of ICam, was founded with the mission of eliminating such failures. Since its inception in 2013, ICam has successfully completed over 1 million cases without a single failure. This level of reliability is unmatched by competitors utilizing IPG or stereophotogrammetry.

Key Advantages of ICam Photogrammetry™

ICam goes beyond accuracy to deliver an exceptional customer experience. Here are some standout features:

Guaranteed Passive Fit: Ensuring consistent success, regardless of user expertise or case complexity.
HotSwap Insurance Protection: Accidents happen. If you drop your ICam, we’ve got you covered.
Radiopaque Titanium Scanbodies: These durable scanbodies can withstand torquing, autoclaving, and are x-ray detectable.
Free Calibration Plate: Maintain precision at no extra cost.
Swiss-Made Quality: Crafted in Switzerland under rigorous quality standards by a world-renowned photogrammetry expert.
24-Hour Support: Assistance whenever you need it.

Why Other Options Fall Short

Competitors’ methods cannot guarantee a passive fit, and their lack of reliability introduces unnecessary risks to your workflow. With inferior calibration, subpar scanbodies, and less precise calculation methods, these systems fail to match the proven track record of ICam.

See the Data for Yourself

Explore our “Key Features Comparison” chart to understand the detailed differences. Better yet, schedule a call with us for a comprehensive walkthrough of why ICam is the world’s #1-selling photogrammetry solution.

Let us help you streamline your workflow and tackle even your toughest full-arch challenges. Click here to schedule a brief call now.